ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF RUDDER GEOMETRY MODIFICATION ON THE HINGE MOMENT COEFFICIENT AND AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE N-XXX AIRCRAFT USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS

Authors

  • Irfan Fadilla Nursamsi Irfan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Nanang Burhan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Reza Setiawan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Siswadi Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35261/barometer.v11i2.13201

Abstract

Recent research shows that modifying the control surface geometry has the potential to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft. The N-XXX pioneer aircraft is equipped with primary control surfaces consisting of ailerons, elevators, and rudders that function to regulate the basic movement of the aircraft. The rudder plays a role in generating yaw movement by generating side forces and hinge moments on the hinge line. The increase in aerodynamic response due to geometry modifications can have a direct impact on directional stability and pilot control loads. This study aims to analyze the effect of a 10% increase in rudder chord on the side force coefficient (CY), drag coefficient (CD), and hinge moment coefficient (CHe) with deflection variations of 0˚, 20˚, and -20˚ using the computational fluid dynamics method. The research stages include geometric modeling, meshing process, numerical simulation, and analysis of the results to obtain the resulting aerodynamic characteristics. The simulation results show that the rudder with a 10% increase in chord consistently increases the hinge moment coefficient across all deflection variations. At 0˚ deflection, the increase reaches approximately 25.8% at a sideslip angle of 10˚. At a 20˚ deflection with a 0˚ sideslip angle, the increase reached 26.7% and at a -20˚ deflection with a 0˚ sideslip angle, the increase reached 26.4%. The side force coefficient increased almost linearly with the sideslip angle, while the drag coefficient increased due to the increase in effective area and changes in pressure distribution. These findings indicate that increasing the rudder area effectively improves the aerodynamic response of the control surface, but implies an increase in control loads that must be anticipated in the design of the aircraft control system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. T. Susilo, E. Suwondo, and T. Mulyanto, “Pengembangan Sistem Aileron Pesawat Terbang Berbasis Elektromekanik,” Mesin, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2024, doi: 10.5614/mesin.2024.30.1.2.

[2] M. H. Amir and Sarwono, “Analisa Nilai Hinge moment Coefficient pada Pengaruh Bentuk Rudder Pesawat N-2xx dengan Variasi Defleksi Rudder 0˚, 10˚, dan 25˚ Berbasis Computational fluid dynamics,” J. Tek. ITS, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 140–145, 2018, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v7i2.35827.

[3] R. C. Nelson, Flight Stability and Automatic Control, 2nd ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1998.

[4] Muchammad, “Analisis Momen Poros Dan Gaya Samping Horn Rudder Bidang Kendali Pesawat N-XXX Menggunakan Computational Fluid Dynamic,” J. Ilm. Momentum, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2019, doi: 10.36499/jim.v15i1.2663.

[5] Suramta, C. Bintoro, and Warsono, “Karakteristik Aerodinamika Airfoil Naca 0015 Dan Naca 4415 Melalui Kajian Eksperimental Dan Simulasi Numerik,” SINERGI POLMED J. Ilm. Tek. Mesin, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 58–69, 2025, doi: 10.51510/sinergipolmed.v6i2.2264.

[6] M. F. A. Wicaksono, G. A. Pohan, and I. T. Hidayath, “Analisa Aerodinamika Airfoil Pesawat Dengan Pendekatan Computational Fluid Dynamic Dan Wind Tunnel,” J. Flywheel, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2022, doi: 10.36040/flywheel.v13i1.4744.

[7] Y. Cengel and J. Cimbala, Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: McGraw Hill, 2006.

[8] J. John D. Anderson, Fundamental of Aerodynamics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.

[9] S. N. Rahmah, “Analisis Aerodinamika Aileron Pesawat N2Xx Dengan Metode Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Digit. Repos. Univ. Jember, pp. 1–76, 2020.

[10] R. Cao and H. Lyu, “A Hinge moment Alleviation Control Strategy for Morphing Tail Aircraft Based on a Data-Driven Method,” Actuators, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.3390/act13090369.

[11] A. S. Taleghani, S. Yektaei, V. Esfahanian, and S. Abdolahipour, “Experimental Study on the Effects of Sideslip and Rudder Deflection Angles on the Aerodynamics of an Aircraft Vertical Tail at Low Speeds” Fluids, vol. 10, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110277.

[12] B. Etkin and L. D. Reid, Dynamics of Flight Stability and Control, 3rd ed. United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.

[13] M. J. Muhammad, Y. Wang, X. Mao, and K. So, “Flow Separation Control of a Vertical Stabiliser Using a Rudder ‑ Mounted Slat,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1065–1086, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10494-025-00640-z.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Irfan, I. F. N., Nanang Burhan, Reza Setiawan, & Siswadi. (2026). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF RUDDER GEOMETRY MODIFICATION ON THE HINGE MOMENT COEFFICIENT AND AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE N-XXX AIRCRAFT USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS. Barometer, 11(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.35261/barometer.v11i2.13201